To make a decision you typically need to implement an analytic process based on facts to see clearly the problem and individuate the most rational and close solution to what you identify as needed.
Even if it looks quite complicated, it is a process that each of us do every day, every time we make a decision. It is rather different from an instinctive reaction that is when we react to external factors immediately and without involving any thinking process. Instinctive reactions are important to help us to make immediate decisions in situations that can put as in danger, but in all other cases we should be able to use our brain.
Since we base our decisions on facts (internal or external) how can we evaluate which should influence or not our choices? Let’s consider 4 categories:
1) Instinctive thoughts: in extreme cases instinct can save your life, so why not to give him a listen in all the other situations? Acting by instinct can be dangerous because it can expose our weak points, fragility, stress, hunger and other feelings that we may not be able to control. But I like to think that instinct, like any other expertise, can be trained with the experience. So try to use it moderately at the beginning, it will become more and more natural with the time.
2) Objectively true facts: Facts that are objectively true are the most important ones, the ones that will really have to influence your decisions. Since we are talking of high quality information, it is not always easy to gather it. Whatever you are exposed to facts, try to investigate on the source of the information, cross check it and criticize it before make it an assert.
3) Personal experiences: Any personal experience that is not yours is nice to know but should not in any case influence your decision. I still remember at the University so much bad stories about teachers that then I found completely untrue. Concepts like difficult, bad and dangerous are always subjective. If someone tell you a movie is horrible, it does not mean you will not add to your top ten ever.
So be careful when receiving feedback from other experiences, each of us is a different person and so each of us reacts differently to situations. (On top of that the Luck can also make the difference sometime)
4) Falsities: It is not easy sometime to understand that facts are false, and this is the biggest danger when making a decision. Nothing is worst to realize that you have jumped on the wrong bridge, and that is too late to come back. So you should absolutely pay attention to facts that smells like false before they can pollute your choice.
Hope you will find this useful, do not hesitate to leave your comment, opinion or share your experience.
Cover picture “Senza Respiro” 1988 Olio su tela, by courtesy of artist Fabio Massimo Caruso, www.fabiomassimocaruso.com
“Decision Maker” is one of the most requested skills for great responsibility roles, and it is clearly not just about making decision, but about doing the good ones.
Most of us do not realize that we make hundred of decisions every day; we go by metro? We just decided to not take the car. We eat in a restaurant? We just decided to don’t go home for cooking…
Indeed what is the difference between a good and a bad decision maker?
In my career it took me some time to understand and be convinced of the importance of doing analysis. I still remember my first job experience, I just wanted to quickly write some code and refactor it n-times to get better results. Did not you?
Things are different today and I am writing this post to share with you my personal approach to analysis. It is not something new, it is just my tailored method based on experience and well known methodologies.
In general you get as input a problem domain (the observed system with all the entities and rules involved) and must produce as output a solution domain (the designed system that solve the original analysis problem). So a good start is to:
- Get a clear view of the problematic to solve,
- Reduce the problem domain to a minimum knowledge space
Cloud platforms come with a variety of options and constraints certainly driven by infrastructure and business needs which indeed diversify their pricing plans and customer adoption as well. But often they also have an implicit value: designing with certain constraints in mind would facilitate scaling and replication, would provide performance gains and increased revenues. Are constraints such as request timeout or limits on outbound traffic and datastore usage, so bad after all? However, when designing for your private hosting, you might skip or ignore few of them and miss an opportunity to improve your service design. Here are few points worth to consider: Read More
Exposing your idea supported by a presentation can be considered a form of art. It implies a creation and an exposition moment; like for any other artistic creation process an idea drives the conception and a good dose of practice can help to better describe the artist intention.
For this reason, during the years, I tried to develop a personal “Aesthetic Theory” of Doing A Presentation. In this “Theory“, beauty is related to three different but related factors:
To arrive to our goal, that is get as much closer as possible to the beauty, we can distinguish three different moments:
- Analysis time: it starts with your commitment to write a presentation, till the moment you start doing it.
- Creation time: it is all the time you spend creating the presentation.
- Presentation time: it is the moment of the truth, when you go live with your presentation.